Skip to content
menu-toggle
menu-close

Toxic Love Quiz  -

30 subtle manipulation explained

Thank you for reviewing the explanations for the 30 challenging scenarios. You can uncover the names of potential abuse and manipulation by hovering or tapping each card. Many of these situations may seem subtle. It's important to note that you don't have to agree with our assessment. Every individual, relationship, family, and culture is unique, and acceptance of these behaviors varies. Ultimately, it's up to you to decide the boundaries you want to establish for yourself.

2

🍀, it is being financially responsible

26-1

 

🚩🚩,  Emotional Blackmail

By implying that honesty will categorize them as "good" children, the parents are using emotional blackmail. This tactic manipulates the child into confessing by leveraging their desire for parental approval and fear of being labeled as 'bad,' potentially stifling honest communication.

27-1

 

🚩🚩,  Gaslighting (in a broader context)

This statement might indicate gaslighting if used manipulatively in a pattern of behavior. By generalizing ex-partners as "crazy," it undermines their credibility and experiences, potentially deflecting from the speaker's accountability in relationship issues.

YOUPLA~1

 

🍀, it is setting boundaries. 

31

 

🚩🚩,  Jealous Control

This question uses jealousy and suspicion to exert control, insinuating that the person smiling at their phone must be hiding something. It’s a form of manipulation that invades privacy and sows seeds of doubt, undermining trust in the relationship and making the person feel unjustly scrutinized for innocent behavior.

12

 

🚩🚩,  Belittling

This comment subtly undermines the individual's appearance or efforts, trivializing their feelings or actions under the guise of a compliment. By diminishing the importance of something that matters to the person, such as a haircut, it minimizes their feelings and can erode self-esteem, representing a form of emotional abuse.

5-2

 

🍀, it is normal not to have spark immediately. By going for a second date is not about wasting each other's time. 

4-2

 

🚩🚩🚩,  Undermining

This whisper campaign against the daughter's aspirations serves to undermine her ambitions and self-confidence. By expressing disbelief in her decision and suggesting it’s not worthy of support due to potential industry challenges, it manipulates the situation to create doubt and discourages pursuing her passion, reflecting a lack of respect for her autonomy and choices.

28-2

 

🚩🚩,  Love Bombing

This gesture, while seemingly grand and romantic, can be a form of love bombing if used manipulatively. By overwhelming someone with affection, gifts, or promises early in a relationship, the person may attempt to create a quick bond and a sense of obligation, potentially leading to an unhealthy power dynamic and dependency.

9

 

🍀, Positive Reinforcement 
This approach is an example of positive reinforcement, where the parents encourage their child to think independently about what they truly want, rather than being influenced by peers. It supports the child's autonomy and decision-making by offering a choice that aligns with their genuine interests, promoting healthy communication and respect for individual desires.

19-1

 

🚩,  Future Faking

By invoking the image of a future family, the speaker is attempting to manipulate the other person's feelings to prevent a breakup. This tactic leverages emotional attachment and potential future dreams to sway the decision, making it difficult for the other person to leave by guilt-tripping them about the impact on hypothetical children, thus exploiting their emotions for personal gain.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

30

 

🚩🚩🚩, Coercive Control

This scenario exemplifies coercive control, where the individual is using ultimatums and emotional blackmail to dictate the terms of a significant moment. By threatening to withdraw as the best man unless his demand to propose at the wedding is met, he is attempting to leverage his position and the importance of his role to manipulate the groom into agreeing with his plan.

15

 

🍀, Insecurity Addressing

This approach reflects an effort to address insecurities within the relationship by expressing a willingness to understand and accept significant aspects of the partner's life, including their past. It's a healthy communication strategy aiming to build trust and transparency by acknowledging the partner's ongoing friendship with their ex and showing openness to integrate that part of their life.

18

 

🚩, Rapid Intimacy Building

This statement aims to create a sense of uniqueness and rapid emotional intimacy by suggesting the other person is exceptionally different early on. While it can be genuine, if used manipulatively, it serves to quickly lower defenses and foster a bond based on perceived special connection, which may not be reflective of the actual depth or health of the relationship.

7-1

 

🚩 Conditional Acceptance

This response hints at conditional acceptance, where the person implies they might only appreciate the other's choices or changes if they can adjust their own preferences. It subtly places pressure on the individual to conform to expected norms or styles, suggesting their value or the acceptance of their choices is contingent upon the speaker's approval, which can undermine confidence and self-expression.

14

 

🚩🚩, Inappropriate Boundary Testing & Bookmarking

This comment tests boundaries by expressing interest despite acknowledging a commitment to another relationship. It's an attempt to flirt or establish a connection under the guise of hypothetical availability, subtly disrespecting both the current relationship and the recipient's understanding of appropriate boundaries.

 

10

 

🚩 🚩 🚩  Blame Shifting

This response shifts the blame for the speaker's lack of communication onto the recipient, suggesting that their anxious behavior is the reason for being ghosted. It manipulates the situation to make the recipient feel responsible for the speaker's decision to withhold information, undermining their feelings and diverting attention from the speaker's accountability.

17

 

🚩 🚩   Retroactive Jealousy with Reassurance Seeking

This scenario illustrates retroactive jealousy, where one partner feels insecure or envious about their partner's past relationships. The request for more information about an ex-partner under the guise of building trust can actually exacerbate feelings of insecurity and jealousy. While it seems to seek reassurance, it risks creating unnecessary comparisons and fostering an unhealthy focus on past relationships rather than strengthening the current one.

16

 

🚩 🚩 🚩  Normalization of Abuse / Codependency

This response normalizes and excuses abusive behavior by attributing it to external factors like past trauma or alcohol consumption. By defending the abuser and minimizing the impact of their actions, it undermines the validity of the daughter's feelings and experiences, potentially teaching her to accept or excuse harmful behaviors in future relationships.

13

 

🚩 🚩  Guilt-Tripping

This is an attempt to guilt-trip by leveraging past loyalty and ignorance of price changes to pressure for a discount. It manipulates the situation by invoking a sense of obligation due to historical relationship, aiming to make the seller feel guilty for normal business practices like adjusting prices over time, thus exploiting emotional ties for financial benefit.

11

 

🚩 Role-Based Expectation Pressure

This behavior places undue pressure by imposing professional standards on personal situations, a form of emotional manipulation. It unfairly exploits the individual's professional identity to set unrealistic expectations for their personal behavior, implying they should always adhere to their professional standards, even in intimate, personal contexts. While not strictly categorized as a widely recognized form of abuse, it is a manipulative tactic that can undermine the person's sense of self and contribute to emotional strain.

6-1

 

🚩 Conditional Praise

This response offers praise but quickly tempers it with a condition that suggests the achievement isn't fully satisfactory or that greater achievements are expected. It implies that the current success is minor compared to potential future accomplishments, which can undermine the significance of the achievement and potentially contribute to feelings of never being good enough or always needing to achieve more to gain approval.

3

 

🚩 🚩  Isolation Tactics

This response uses isolation tactics by discouraging social interactions outside the relationship, under the guise of concern over the influence of friends. It aims to limit the person's social circle and increase dependency on the relationship for social engagement, potentially undermining independence and leading to emotional isolation from supportive networks.

24-1

 

🚩   Emotional Exploitation

This approach can manipulate employees' emotions to encourage them to go above and beyond, often without appropriate compensation or regard for their work-life balance, under the pretense of familial loyalty and dedication. It exploits the natural human desire for belonging and significance, potentially leading to an unhealthy work environment where employees feel obligated to put the company's needs above their own well-being.

23-1

 

🚩 🚩 🚩  Minimization of Abuse

This advice minimizes the impact of abuse by suggesting that forgiveness alone is the key to freedom, potentially overlooking the complex emotional, psychological, and sometimes physical harm caused by abusive relationships. It places undue pressure on the individual to forgive in order to heal, which can invalidate their feelings and experiences, implying that their continued suffering is due to a lack of forgiveness rather than the abuse itself.

29

 

🚩 Conditional Support

This statement offers support with a condition attached, subtly suggesting that the person's value or contribution to the household is contingent upon their ability to perform domestic duties, especially during a difficult time. While it may seem reasonable, framing support in this manner can add pressure and imply that their worth is tied to their productivity, potentially exacerbating feelings of inadequacy or stress. 

 

8-1

 

🚩 🚩  Guilt Induction

This scenario uses guilt induction by implying that failing to update grandma could negatively impact her health, thereby placing the responsibility for her well-being on the individual's behavior. It manipulates the person into compliance by exploiting their concern for grandma's health, suggesting that any negative outcomes would be their fault, which can create an undue sense of obligation and stress.

25-1

 

🚩 Victim Blaming

Indirectly suggesting that the individual is at fault for the negative outcomes of the divorce due to not heeding prior warnings. It shifts the focus from the harm caused by the ex-partner to the decisions of the individual, potentially minimizing their experience of betrayal or loss and complicating their healing process by adding a layer of guilt or regret over their choices.

20-1

 

🚩  Dismissing /Avoiding Conflict

This behavior can hinder effective communication and resolution, potentially leading to unresolved issues and resentment within the relationship. Healthy relationships typically involve open and honest communication, including the willingness to address disagreements and work through them together for mutual understanding and growth.

21-1

 

🚩 Emotional Manipulation

This statement uses emotional manipulation by threatening the child with negative consequences related to their behavior. By invoking the concept of Santa and the "naughty list," it aims to control the child's behavior through fear and the potential loss of a reward. This tactic can instill anxiety and undermine the child's sense of self-worth, as well as their trust in the parent-child relationship.